Mitigation of damages is an important concept in personal injury law and contract law. The duty to mitigate damages is based on the idea that a defendant should not have to compensate you for losses that you could have avoided through the exercise of reasonable care. In other words, after an injury, it is your duty not to make things even worse and then demand that the defendant pay for your irresponsible behavior.
If you are suing a defendant in Oregon for personal injury and they raise an affirmative defense, the burden of proof is reversed. Normally, you must prove the claim since you’re the one who brought the lawsuit in the first place. With an affirmative defense, however, the defendant must prove their claim–in this case, the claim that you failed to mitigate your damages.
Regardless of whether it’s you trying to prove the defendant’s liability or the defendant is trying to prove that you failed to mitigate Damages, you don’t have to prove your claim “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
All you need to meet is “a preponderance of the evidence” standard, which means more likely than not. The defendant must apply the same standard to prove that you failed to mitigate your damages.
To prevail in their affirmative defenses, the defendant must prove the following :
Failure to mitigate damages is usually a partial defense. For the defendant, “winning” in this context means a reduction in the amount of compensation that the defendant owes you.
Suppose, for example, that you’re asking for $100,000 in compensation. Further, suppose the defendant proves that if you had followed your doctor’s instructions to the letter, you could have saved $30,000 in medical expenses. That would still leave you with $70,000.
The following are some common ways of failing to mitigate damages:
There are many other possible means of mitigating damages, depending on the circumstances of your case.
A defendant might offer the following evidence, among other evidence, to prove their failure to mitigate damages defense.
If a lawsuit is ongoing, the defendant might gather some of this evidence during the pretrial discovery process, including:
This is just the tip of the iceberg of potential evidence of failure to mitigate damages.
Not all personal injury claims mature into lawsuits. Even among those that do, most parties manage to settle before trial. All of the dynamics described above should apply to negotiations as well. The defendant will certainly bring up any mitigation of damages claim during negotiations.
If your case is serious enough to generate a “failure to mitigate damages” defense, you probably do need a Portland personal injury attorney to help you maximize the value of your claim. A good attorney might be able to multiply the amount of compensation that you qualify for.
Contact our lawyer from Tillmann Law at (503) 773-3333 for a free consultation and to learn more about mitigating damages.